Injection Molding with the PCNC?

February 24, 2011 by: Greg Jackson

Sneak Peak – Plas­tic Injec­tion Mold­ing Acces­sory
Here’s a pre­view of some­thing I’ll bet nobody was expecting


Down­load with Vixy | YouTube Con­verter

It’s an acces­sory for your PCNC mill which will make it into a plas­tic injec­tion mold­ing machine.  It sim­ply clamps on to the spin­dle nose.  You use your machine vise to hold the mold.  There is a pres­sure feed­back sen­sor that plugs into the acces­sory port on the oper­a­tor con­sole of the mill.  Cut the mold with the mill, attach the mold­ing acces­sory, then mold a part.  Sweet.

No release date or price estab­lished yet.  Right now the prod­uct is in the process of mov­ing from work­ing pro­to­type to pro­duc­tion prod­uct.  It seemed like a cool idea at the time of inspi­ra­tion, but once got into it we were pretty sur­prised at how well it actu­ally worked.  As devel­op­ments go, this one has seen rel­a­tively few road­blocks so far.  We expect to release this some­time in 2011.

Story Behind the Invention

There have been desk­top injec­tion mold­ers avail­able for years. They gen­er­ally have just a few pri­mary components:

  1. Heat­ing cham­ber for plastic
  2. Ram, act­ing as pis­ton in the heat­ing chamber
  3. Vise to hold a mold
  4. Ver­ti­cal motion sys­tem, able to deliver high force
  5. Rigid frame­work for all

When we looked the stan­dard desk­top molder, we real­ized that a PCNC mill already has items 3, 4, and 5.  All it needed was 1 and 2.  Stan­dard desk­top injec­tion mold­ers take a bit of skill to get the right com­bi­na­tion of tem­per­a­ture, pres­sure and mold fill time for a good injec­tion.  We devel­oped a sys­tem using a sen­sor, the acces­sory input port, and the mill con­trol, to auto­mate all that in a repeat­able fash­ion, once the right recipe is found.

The sys­tem works well and pro­duces good mold­ings using many dif­fer­ent types of plas­tics.  This is not going to put any­one into the pro­duc­tion busi­ness, but it’s great for mak­ing a few parts, mak­ing a spe­cialty prod­uct, or test­ing out a concept.

Out of the Left Field?

OK Tor­mach watch­ers, I know this prod­uct seems to come out of the blue.  But if you squint your eyes just a bit, or have a cou­ple beers, you might see that is a method to our mad­ness.  The Tor­mach touch probe, Dual­ity Lathe, Tor­mach Speeder, CNC Scan­ner, and oth­ers of our unique acces­sories, they all have a com­mon theme.  What they do is take advan­tage of the PCNC mill, using it as a foun­da­tion to extend the capa­bil­ity of the machine and pro­vide greater range of func­tions to your shop.  For many PCNC own­ers, the mill is the most expen­sive tool in their shop.  What we’re try­ing to do is to allow peo­ple to lever­age their invest­ment, mak­ing it pos­si­ble to do more for less.

Do you have an idea for a use­ful mill acces­sory?  Let us know, maybe we can help.  Whether we’re doing the devel­op­ment our­selves, or assist­ing as we have done with the Tor­mach Approved pro­gram, we like to see these crazy ideas come to come to life.

Greg Jack­son

Pres­i­dent

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rat­ing: 10.0/10 (8 votes cast)
Injec­tion Mold­ing with the PCNC?, 10.0 out of 10 based on 8 ratings
Be Socia­ble, Share!
Greg Jackson

About

After nearly three decades of machine design, research, and devel­op­ment, Greg Jack­son founded Tor­mach LLC, a pre­mier man­u­fac­turer of afford­able CNC mills and acces­sories. Since its incep­tion in 2002, Tor­mach has grown from a garage busi­ness to a global oper­a­tion based out of Wau­na­kee, Wis­con­sin. Jack­son holds both a BS and MS in Mechan­i­cal Engi­neer­ing from the Uni­ver­sity of Wis­con­sin, Madi­son and has been awarded 4 US patents.

24 Responses to “Injection Molding with the PCNC?”

  1. Wow the Tor­mach is turn­ing into a Trans­former !!! I like to think of mine as Mega­tron. 8)

    Nice job Andy, looks very inter­est­ing. One thing I can’t see in the video is how the injec­tor and mold match up. Is there some sort of o-ring seal insert that feeds into the mold ?

  2. John says:

    Awe­some. I only have one prob­lem with this video: Andy — what hap­pened to the scruff!

  3. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    Haha. Lit­tle bit of time trav­el­ing going on here — Shot this movie in November.

  4. Colin K says:

    How much ben­e­fit does the con­trol of the injec­tion speed and pres­sure pro­vide? Does it mean you eas­ily knock out 50 per­fect shots after dial­ing it in, ver­sus say a 20% fail­ure rate by hand?

  5. This is so awe­some, it opens up a new win­dow of R&D for me to do. I mean it could eas­ily do 50-100pcs a year for what I would need.

  6. David Crissman says:

    Dear Greg and Andy:

    You guys at Tor­mach are the best. Great idea and great product..

  7. Dave Hultman says:

    Really cool, I want one… I was very impressed with your machines, facil­ity and per­sonal when I recently attended your Sprut­cam train­ing class, keep up the good work.

  8. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    Guys, Thanks for all the com­ments. I’m plan­ning on bring­ing this to the Dig­i­tal Machin­ist Work­shop in June if you like to see in per­son:
    http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=10

  9. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    No, Noth­ing like that. Just a metal noz­zle that you posi­tion over the sprue hole. Works really nice.

  10. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    Basi­cally, yeah — it lets you con­trol two addi­tional process vari­ables that you can’t con­trol with a hand acti­vated ram. So you’re get­ting the same shot every time, more or less.

  11. Randy Hearn says:

    You guys con­tinue to sur­prise me. I was actu­ally about to write a check for a machine, but now may hold off. It looks like I may be able to make larger molds with the Tormach?

    Please tell me this will work on the 770 as well:)

  12. David Borden says:

    So freak­ing cool!! Man you guys are dream­ing up some really awe­some add ons!

    David

  13. Dave M says:

    Andy, after see­ing this per­haps I should ask you (before I shell out a cou­ple grand on the pur­chase of a dif­fer­ent machine I’ve had my eye on) — any plans for adding an extruder head for a 3D printer attach­ment? You’ve already got the heater con­troller, just need an addi­tional axis for a step­per dri­ven extruder.

    Should I wait a while before pur­chas­ing one? :)

  14. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    Dave, we’ve thought a bit about this. But not much more than that at the moment. I have seem some cool home­brew plans, I think it was some­where on the RepRao site. Also, some of low-cost print­ers on the mar­ket now look to be very capa­ble. Which one are you look­ing at?

  15. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    The 770 ver­sion needs a few pieces resized around the heat­ing cham­ber, but will share most of the parts oth­er­wise. I think some­thing might be avail­able shortly after the 1100 version.

  16. david_f_knight says:

    Very, very cool!

    Is it too early to tell us what the max­i­mum vol­ume shot size will be?

  17. Dave M says:

    Andy, the 3D printer I’ve been look­ing at is the Ulti­maker. They’re still ramp­ing up for pro­duc­tion so they aren’t avail­able for order yet. Looks like a pretty capa­ble machine with about an 8″ x 8″ build vol­ume. There’s also the Up printer that’s about twice the cost, but has great out­put qual­ity. The build vol­ume on that is too small for some of the parts I’m look­ing at pro­to­typ­ing. I know there’s been talk on the Mach Yahoo Group about adding an extruder head to a cnc mill, but I haven’t seen any­one do it yet. I sup­pose my Series I PCNC1100 might be a lit­tle slow com­pared to how some of those lit­tle print­ers can move.

  18. Randy Hearn says:

    Thanks Andy.. I think you guys should start design­ing on the 770 and scale things up so we 770 own­ers get things first:)

    For the 3D printer I have already bought a RepRap and con­sid­ered adding an extruder to the head of the 770. But due heating/cooling I fig­ured it would just tie up the CNC. I plan to use the reprap to spit out first arti­cle pro­to­types while the 770 is cut­ting the actual pro­to­types. But if you get some­thing work­ing I am all ears, would prob­a­bly need some sort of heated bed.

  19. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    Thanks David. Its about 1 oz. Maybe 1.5oz. I haven’t done a final mea­sure­ment to con­firm yet, but its in that range.

  20. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    Noth­ing really going on a 3D printer attach­ment here. I thought a plas­truder attach­ment might be a cool design con­test for the blog — don’t know how many peo­ple would be inter­ested, though…

  21. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    Actu­ally, I hop­ing to have some­thing 770 spe­cific on the blog very soon. The parts are sup­posed to show up today..

  22. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    I hadn’t seen the Ulti­maker before — what’s dif­fer­ent between that one and maker bot? Look sim­i­lar on the surface

  23. Randy Hearn says:

    Hey Andy.. I’ll be watch­ing. My tax return comes in the 22nd of this month and I need some­thing new to play with. I was to buy the scan­ner soft­ware soon as well:)

  24. Andrew Grevstad Andy G. says:

    Okay

    Just con­firmed — the Shot size is 1.0 oz.